Comments on Egbert

Egbert states that CALL, since its original meaning of computer-assisted language learning, has grown into a broader field that continues to expand as the technologies develop. As the field develops, it can be tempting to place a greater focus on the technology. However, the issue to remember is how this tool aids, assists, and enhances the language learning, which should be foremost in the minds of the instructors. Egbert also lists four components of how to use technology to enhance language learning, including adhering to effective principles of general learning in the classroom, “integrating ESL standards,” using the computers/technology to meet the language learning goals and not the other way around, and following guidelines for “using educational technology in the classroom” (Egbert, 2005). The basic point of this introduction is to reinforce the idea that good teaching and learning principles should be incorporated into the classroom and that this process can be enhanced through technology.

The concept presented by Egbert I most agreed with was his emphasis that learning should take the priority in the learning / technology equation. Before computers, people were very capable of effectively processing information in a manner that led to clear understanding. While the advent of computer technologies will not change this ability, it may enable it to be more efficient and effective in certain settings. This doesn’t mean that computers are necessarily effective by themselves; rather, their flexibility and functionality can be used alongside good teaching techniques to assist learning.